M. Marlene Troche and Nick v. Troche v‪.‬

This is an appeal from a decision of the district court upholding the enforcement of a rental contract which was found to
be implied-in-law by the magistrate division. The disputed issues on appeal are whether there is sufficient evidence to support
the factual findings and whether either of the parties is entitled to attorney fees. The facts of this case are as follows. The Troches and the Giers were friends. The Giers became insolvent, filed for bankruptcy,
and lost their home. They planned to live in their trailer for the winter. The Troches became aware of the situation and allowed
the Giers to move into an empty townhouse which they owned. The Troches also agreed to put the utilities in their name because
the Giers were unable to obtain credit.