M.O.S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co. M.O.S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co.

M.O.S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co‪.‬

C09.125 , 375 F.2d 614 (1967)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: Appellant, the holder of the patent in suit, appeals from a judgment in favor of appellee in an action for infringement. This is the second appeal in this case. In M.O.S. Corp. v. John I. Haas Co., 9 Cir., 1964, 332 F.2d 910, we reversed a judgment in favor of appellee. We held that it was error for the trial court to apply the doctrine of file wrapper estoppel in deciding that the patent was not infringed. We did not rule on the validity of the patent. Upon remand, the trial court received additional evidence. It again found that the patent was not infringed, but did not pass upon its validity, although that question was expressly raised by appellee, was stated as an issue in the amended pretrial order, and was litigated. On the present appeal, we affirm, but on the ground that the patent is invalid, rather than that appellee did not infringe.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1967
21 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
72.1
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Cochrane United States v. Cochrane
1993
Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004
United States v. Navidad-Marcos United States v. Navidad-Marcos
2004
United States v. Joyce United States v. Joyce
2004
In re Marshall In re Marshall
2004
Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation
2005