Samuel Henry Uhl v. State Texas
1972.TX.40632; 479 S.W.2D 55
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
It is contended that the evidence is insufficient because the testimony of the prosecutrix was not corroborated, that the doctor who examined her did not testify and that the appellant could not have committed rape because he was intoxicated. He also complains because leading questions were asked of the prosecutrix.