Scott Richard Seelye v. State Minnesota
1988.MN.660 , 429 N.W.2D 669
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Appellant challenges the revocation of his probation on the grounds that hearsay and illegally obtained evidence were improperly admitted, that the record does not support revocation, and that a continuance was improperly granted. Because the district court did not err in admitting certain evidence or abuse its discretion in revoking probation or granting the continuance, we affirm.