[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration

[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration

87 F.3d 1319, 1996.C09.42377

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

MEMORANDUM* Chapter 7 debtors Curtis and Mary Ann Haskins (""Haskinses"") appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in their action alleging various constitutional and statutory violations arising from loans made by the Farmers Home Administration (""FmHA"") to the Haskinses. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The Haskinses contend that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for defendants on the basis that the Haskinses lacked standing to bring their action against defendants. We review de novo a district court's determination that a party lacks standing to bring an action in federal court. See Bruce v. United States, 759 F.2d 755, 758 (9th Cir. 1985).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
19 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60.2
KB

More Books by Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996
[T][U] Bostick v. Reliance Electric [T][U] Bostick v. Reliance Electric
1996