![Village Prentice and Another v. Department](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Village Prentice and Another v. Department](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Village Prentice and Another v. Department
1968.WI.57 , 156 N.W.2D 482, 38 WIS. 2D 219
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
This is an appeal from two judgments in separate but related matters. The judgments affirmed orders of the industrial commission which had found that the respondents, Adam Boho and John Geng, were employees of the village of Prentice for workmens compensation purposes.