Young v. City of Plaquemine Young v. City of Plaquemine

Young v. City of Plaquemine

818 So.2d 892, 2002.LA.0000758

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

By this appeal, the plaintiffs contest the granting of summary judgment in favor of two defendants and the dismissal of those defendants from their action for damages resulting from lead poisoning. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. It is undisputed that, on August 12, 1993, the City of Plaquemine entered into a contract with architect Gary Hebert for the renovation of a building it had recently purchased in Plaquemine, Louisiana, to be used as a police station for the Plaquemine Police Department (Plaquemine Police Station). The contract was publicly bid and subsequently awarded to Edward Earl Comeaux d/b/a Comeaux Brothers Construction (Comeaux Brothers), on November 28, 1994. Comeaux Brothers subcontracted the painting services to Stockton Painting Company, the employer of the plaintiffs, Michael Garvin, 1 Thomas Wayne Young and Randy Joseph Sanchez.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
10 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59.2
KB

More Books by Louisiana Court Of Appeals

Weeks v. Angelo Iafrate Construction Co. Weeks v. Angelo Iafrate Construction Co.
2003
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Louisiana v. Harrington National Union Fire Insurance Company of Louisiana v. Harrington
2003
State v. Stevenson State v. Stevenson
2002
Mccool v. Beauregard Memorial Hospital Mccool v. Beauregard Memorial Hospital
2002
Allen v. Allen Allen v. Allen
2001
State v. Bourgeois State v. Bourgeois
2001