An Unworthy Foe: Heroic "E[Theta][Eta], Trickery, And an Insult in Ephesians 6:11. An Unworthy Foe: Heroic "E[Theta][Eta], Trickery, And an Insult in Ephesians 6:11.

An Unworthy Foe: Heroic "E[Theta][Eta], Trickery, And an Insult in Ephesians 6:11‪.‬

Journal of Biblical Literature 2011, Winter, 130, 4

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

The literary and conceptual frameworks within which scholars have interpreted Eph 6:10-20 have been quite limited. Various studies have pointed out the similarities between this text and the divine warrior motif, especially in Isaiah, and its subsequent adaptation in the Wisdom of Solomon and the authentic Pauline letters. (1) In addition, many notable scholars have pointed out the striking similarities between the language and themes of Ephesians and certain writings from Qumran. (2) In my opinion, both of these approaches are legitimate to the extent that the similarities and parallels clearly exist and must be accounted for in any interpretation of the text. Apart from these literary sources, other commentators have attempted to explain the language of Eph 6:10-20 by speculating that the author merely drew on his own experiences and observations, which were subsequently included in the metaphors of the panoply in w. 14-17, or that the author is adapting the language of a baptismal catechesis. (3) These linguistic and contextual frameworks have clearly impacted the way in which the passage has been understood, with interpretations ranging from a reference to an eschatological battle to a practical theology reading involving individuals in their struggle with evil. Nevertheless, in spite of many significant advances in our understanding of Eph 6:10-20, much of the language remains unexplained. For example, why does the author divide the combatants into two clearly defined groups by assigning to each group distinctive martial characteristics and practices? Why is strength the distinctive goal of the believers, and why is there a specific focus on heavy armament? Why is the enemy of the believers depicted as one who uses stratagems or tricks (6:11) and missile weapons (6:16)? In this article, I will argue that another literary and conceptual context needs to be considered, especially since previous studies have failed to explain the antithetical descriptions of the combatants in vv. 10-12 and 16 and the devil as a trickster in v. 11. More specifically, I will argue that the evidence strongly suggests that this portrayal of the devil is based on an ancient Greek model of cunning in warfare. This model originated in the heroic tradition, principally Homer, and served as the antithesis of a competitive heroic virtue, strength. When combined with its opposite, it often carried negative connotations, implications that I will argue carry over into Eph 6:11. When the author labels the archenemy of believers as a trickster, he is not only issuing the literary equivalent of a "challenge-riposte," but he is also slandering the enemy of the community with a traditional insult drawn from one of the important symbols of Greek culture. (4) The language thus symbolically encodes various honorific and shameful attributes to the different combatants and labels the enemy of the believers as an unworthy foe. The evidence for this position is threefold. First, Eph 6:10-20 is structured to emphasize the contrast between the two combatants and their characteristic forms of combat. Second, the believers are clearly depicted in a manner reminiscent of the primary qualities of what has been labeled by Everett Wheeler as the "Achilles ethos," which was a common paradigm of strength and openness in battle. (5) Finally, the devil/evil one conducts his combat in a manner reminiscent of the so-called "Odysseus ethos," which was a common paradigm of trickery and guile in warfare. (6) These three elements combine to portray the enemy of the believers in Eph 6:11 in a negative light, especially as a shameful and dishonorable opponent.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
2011
22 décembre
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
42
Pages
ÉDITIONS
Society of Biblical Literature
TAILLE
234,6
Ko
War as Spectacle War as Spectacle
2015
Greek Literature in the Classical Period: The Prose of Historiography and Oratory Greek Literature in the Classical Period: The Prose of Historiography and Oratory
2014
The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic
2020
The Cambridge Companion to Homer The Cambridge Companion to Homer
2004
Conflict and Consensus in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry Conflict and Consensus in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry
2017
Roman Epic Roman Epic
2003
Discerning Trajectories: 4Qinstruction and the Sapiential Background of the Sayings Source Q. Discerning Trajectories: 4Qinstruction and the Sapiential Background of the Sayings Source Q.
2005
The Worldly and Heavenly Wisdom of 4Qinstruction. The Worldly and Heavenly Wisdom of 4Qinstruction.
2005
The Messiah of the Amidah: A Study in Comparative Messianism (Critical Notes) (Reprint) The Messiah of the Amidah: A Study in Comparative Messianism (Critical Notes) (Reprint)
1997
The Johannine Prologue and Jewish Didactic Hymn Traditions: A New Case for Reading the Prologue As a Hymn. The Johannine Prologue and Jewish Didactic Hymn Traditions: A New Case for Reading the Prologue As a Hymn.
2009
How Accurate Are Eyewitnesses? Bauckham and the Eyewitnesses in the Light of Psychological Research (Richard Bauckham) (Critical Essay) How Accurate Are Eyewitnesses? Bauckham and the Eyewitnesses in the Light of Psychological Research (Richard Bauckham) (Critical Essay)
2010
Syntactical and Text-Critical Observations on John 20:30-31: One More Round on the Purpose of the Fourth Gospel. Syntactical and Text-Critical Observations on John 20:30-31: One More Round on the Purpose of the Fourth Gospel.
2005