D. B. Benson Et Al. v. O. A. Harrell Et Al. D. B. Benson Et Al. v. O. A. Harrell Et Al.

D. B. Benson Et Al. v. O. A. Harrell Et Al‪.‬

1959.TX.40596 324 S.W.2D 620

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

This is a suit for attorneys fee. Plaintiffs, D. B. Benson et al., sought by one count to recover same as though it were a liquidated property in the nature of a 50% interest in overriding royalty related to production under a certain oil and gas lease. The theory was that plaintiffs were entitled to recover the interest under and by virtue of a written contract of employment. In the alternative, plaintiffs sought by another count to recover on quantum meruit a judgment in money for the value of their services. Resisting the claim, the defendant O. A. Harrell filed a motion for summary judgment. He will be hereinafter referred to as the only defendant, since the other party sued was a mere stakeholder. Upon a hearing, summary judgment was entered in behalf of the defendant. Plaintiffs appealed.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1959
15 mai
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
7
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
59,4
Ko

Plus de livres par fort Worth Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

Parchman Et Al. v. Parchman Parchman Et Al. v. Parchman
1951
George Wilderspin v. Bewley Mills George Wilderspin v. Bewley Mills
1957
S. J. Rogers Et Al. v. Charles Scaling S. J. Rogers Et Al. v. Charles Scaling
1955
Jim W. Crofford v. Lon N. Bowden Jim W. Crofford v. Lon N. Bowden
1958
Alvey v. Goforth Alvey v. Goforth
1953
Alamo Cas. Co. v. William Reeves & Co. Et Al. Alamo Cas. Co. v. William Reeves & Co. Et Al.
1953