ford v. Bd. of Cty. Comrs of Converse ford v. Bd. of Cty. Comrs of Converse

ford v. Bd. of Cty. Comrs of Converse

924 P.2D 91, 1996.WY.0000122

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

Although Appellee Board of County Commissioners of Converse County had adopted a land use plan, it had not adopted any zoning resolutions. Instead, the board of county commissioners utilized the development regulations which were included in the Converse County Subdivision, Development and Flood Damage Prevention Regulations. The regulations provided that a landowner who desired to develop property within the county had to obtain a development permit. The county planner, however, was not authorized to grant a development permit when the desired use of the property was not in compliance with the land use plan. In that - Page 93 instance, the applicant had to apply to the board of county commissioners for a variance from the land use plan.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1996
24 septembre
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
9
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
62,9
Ko

Plus de livres par Supreme Court of the United States

De Saussure v. Gaillard. De Saussure v. Gaillard.
1888
Korematsu v. United States Korematsu v. United States
1944
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Et Al. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Et Al.
1983
German Alliance Insurance Company v. Lewis German Alliance Insurance Company v. Lewis
1914
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3
2024