In re Marshall In re Marshall

In re Marshall

392 F.3d 1118, 2005 Daily Journal D.A.R. 36, 44 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 14, 5 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8, C09.0001601(2004)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

The surviving spouse alleges that E. Pierce Marshall tortiously interfered with an expected inter vivos gift from the decedent.
Three courts-the Texas probate court, the U.S. bankruptcy court and the U.S. district court-have rendered conflicting judgments
that decide the claims of the surviving spouse and that affect the distribution of the net property of the decedent's trust
and probate estate.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
2004
30 décembre
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
41
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
DÉTAILS DU FOURNISSEUR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAILLE
76,8
Ko
Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos
1996
United States v. Cochrane United States v. Cochrane
1993
Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004
United States v. Navidad-Marcos United States v. Navidad-Marcos
2004
United States v. Joyce United States v. Joyce
2004
Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation
2005