Is No Child Left Behind an un (Or Under) Funded Federal Mandate? Evidence from Texas. Is No Child Left Behind an un (Or Under) Funded Federal Mandate? Evidence from Texas.

Is No Child Left Behind an un (Or Under) Funded Federal Mandate? Evidence from Texas‪.‬

National Tax Journal 2004, Sept, 57, 3

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

INTRODUCTION The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) requires that states establish academic performance goals for all students and for separate groups of students characterized by race, ethnicity, poverty, disability, and limited English proficiency. The legislation mandates annual testing of all students in grades three through eight and testing at least once in grades 10 through 12. The legislation also requires that schools make annual progress in meeting state-determined student performance goals. By 2013-14, the NCLB law mandates that 100 percent of students in each sub-group perform at a proficient level as determined by test standards established by each state. Those schools that fail to meet their adequate yearly progress (AYP) goals will be subject to sanctions. To help states meet the requirements imposed by NCLB, over the past two years Congress increased federal funding for elementary and secondary education by over 40 percent.

GENRE
Entreprise et management
SORTIE
2004
1 septembre
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
40
Pages
ÉDITIONS
National Tax Association
DÉTAILS DU FOURNISSEUR
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
TAILLE
305,4
Ko
Fiscal Policy in Urban Education Fiscal Policy in Urban Education
2002
Public School Reform, Expectations, And Capitalization: What Signals Quality to Homebuyers? Public School Reform, Expectations, And Capitalization: What Signals Quality to Homebuyers?
2009
Improving Public High Schools: Evidence from New York (Report) Improving Public High Schools: Evidence from New York (Report)
2008
Diversity and School District Spending (Economics ARTICLES) Diversity and School District Spending (Economics ARTICLES)
2008
A Response of High School Teachers to the Adoption of State Economic Standards (Economics EDUCATION ARTICLES) A Response of High School Teachers to the Adoption of State Economic Standards (Economics EDUCATION ARTICLES)
2006
District Level Mandates and High School Students' Understanding of Economics (Economics EDUCATION ARTICLES) District Level Mandates and High School Students' Understanding of Economics (Economics EDUCATION ARTICLES)
2008
Horizontal Inequity in the Property Taxation of Apartment, Industrial, Office, And Retail Properties. Horizontal Inequity in the Property Taxation of Apartment, Industrial, Office, And Retail Properties.
2006
Comment on Desai and Hines, "Old Rules and New Realities: Corporate Tax Policy in a Global Setting" (Response to Mihir A. Desai and James R. Hines Jr., National Tax Journal, Vol. 57, P. 937, December 2004) Comment on Desai and Hines, "Old Rules and New Realities: Corporate Tax Policy in a Global Setting" (Response to Mihir A. Desai and James R. Hines Jr., National Tax Journal, Vol. 57, P. 937, December 2004)
2005
The AMT: What's Wrong and How to Fix It (Alternative Minimum Tax) The AMT: What's Wrong and How to Fix It (Alternative Minimum Tax)
2007
Implementing a Progressive Consumption Tax: Advantages of Adopting the VAT Credit-Method System (Forum: The Value-Added Tax) Implementing a Progressive Consumption Tax: Advantages of Adopting the VAT Credit-Method System (Forum: The Value-Added Tax)
2006
A Tale of Two Tax Cuts, A Wage Squeeze, And a Tax Credit. A Tale of Two Tax Cuts, A Wage Squeeze, And a Tax Credit.
2006
Deficits, Interest Rates, And the User Cost of Capital: A Reconsideration of the Effects of Tax Policy on Investment (35Th Annual Spring Symposium and State Tax Program) Deficits, Interest Rates, And the User Cost of Capital: A Reconsideration of the Effects of Tax Policy on Investment (35Th Annual Spring Symposium and State Tax Program)
2005