King v. El Dorado Motor Co. King v. El Dorado Motor Co.

King v. El Dorado Motor Co‪.‬

181 Kan. 477, 311 P.2d 999, KS.0042114(1957)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

The opinion of the court was delivered by This case stems from a workmen's compensation proceeding in
which the district court awarded compensation to an employee
against the employer only. The employer appeals from the judgment
and decision of the trial court denying an award against an
insurance broker. Lewis V. King sustained accidental injuries arising out of and
in the course of his employment on June 22, 1954, while working
for E.L. Noffsinger, d/b/a Noffsinger Motors and/or El Dorado
Motor Company. Thereafter he instituted proceedings for
compensation under provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act,
naming Noffsinger and Bituminous Casualty Corporation as
respondents. Subsequently Noffsinger filed with the Commissioner
an application to make Carl Murray, "Hobe" Murray and Ruth A.
Murray, d/b/a Murray Insurance Agency, additional respondents on
the ground that Bituminous or the additional parties named,
either or all, were obligated to provide him with a defense to
the action and to pay claimant any compensation due under the
Workmen's Compensation Act. This application was granted.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1957
8 juin
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
9
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
57,8
Ko

Plus de livres par Supreme Court of Kansas

Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs
1996
In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks
1996
Gillespie v. Seymour Gillespie v. Seymour
1991
Bair v. Peck Bair v. Peck
1991
Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons
1975
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
1986