Kinman v. R. K. O. Cinti. Midwest Corp. Kinman v. R. K. O. Cinti. Midwest Corp.

Kinman v. R. K. O. Cinti. Midwest Corp‪.‬

171 OHIO ST. 72, 168 N.E.2D 145, 1960.OH.40110

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

Throughout her argument, the plaintiff urges that, in descending the stairs, she stepped into a "depression," "cavity," or "hole" caused by the "worn" condition of the carpeting on one of the steps. Although not specifically stated, it is apparently her contention that an accelerated rate of wear of the carpet as compared with that of the "rubber" or "plastic" nosing of the stair caused a lower area to exist between it and the riser. However, a review of the record fails to reveal that the words, "cavity," "depression" or "hole," were ever used by any witness.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1960
1 juin
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
2
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
59,2
Ko

Plus de livres par The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio

Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati
1987
Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli
1987
Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth. Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth.
1953
In re Pottery In re Pottery
1954
State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
2004
State v. Doe State v. Doe
2004