Kleck V. Wayland Kleck V. Wayland

Kleck V. Wayland

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

The plaintiff contends that the service he is now, and has been, rendering is agricultural and not commercial in its nature and that he should not be required to contribute to the unemployment compensation fund. We quote the part of plaintiff's complaint giving his residence and describing the kind of labor he and his employees perform and do:

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1939
6 mai
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
8
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
51,8
Ko

Plus de livres par Arizona Supreme Court

City of Phoenix v. Green City of Phoenix v. Green
1937
State V. Coerver State V. Coerver
1966
Swanson v. Image Bank Swanson v. Image Bank
2003
Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole
1995
Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp. Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp.
1995
Sohl v. Winkler Sohl v. Winkler
1994