Kleinfield v. Veruki

Wendy L. Kleinfield seeks reversal of a judgment which denied her spousal support on the ground that her marriage to Peter Veruki was bigamous. Because Kleinfield was a party to a voidable marriage that had not been annulled when she married Veruki, we affirm the trial courts decision. Peter Veruki also appeals from the judgment entered and alleges that the trial court erroneously awarded attorneys fees and erroneously failed to provide restitution for pendente lite spousal support paid prior to judgment. Because the trial judge did not abuse his discretion, we also affirm his decision to award attorneys fees and pendente lite spousal support.