Minimal Risk and Large-Scale Biobank and Cohort Research Minimal Risk and Large-Scale Biobank and Cohort Research

Minimal Risk and Large-Scale Biobank and Cohort Research

Health Law Review 2009, Spring-Summer, 17, 2-3

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

Introduction Minimal risk is a core concept in research ethics, but its proper role in the regulation of large-scale biobank and cohort research is unsettled. By framing a project as posing only minimal risk to research participants, researchers may be afforded a degree of latitude in the design and implementation of consent procedures. In the context of large-scale population biobank and cohort studies, whether and to what degree of specificity one is required to seek informed consent from study participants is a critical issue. (1)

GENRE
Santé et bien-être
SORTIE
2009
22 mars
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
16
Pages
ÉDITIONS
Health Law Institute
DÉTAILS DU FOURNISSEUR
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
TAILLE
77,3
Ko
Decision-Making Processes Regarding Cancer Technologies: A Review (Canada) Decision-Making Processes Regarding Cancer Technologies: A Review (Canada)
2008
Exploiting the Fiduciary Relationship: The Physician As Information Intermediary in Assisted Human Reproduction (Canada) Exploiting the Fiduciary Relationship: The Physician As Information Intermediary in Assisted Human Reproduction (Canada)
2009
Submission to Standing Committee on Health Bill 52, Health Information Amendment Act, 2009 April 24, 2009 (Alberta) Submission to Standing Committee on Health Bill 52, Health Information Amendment Act, 2009 April 24, 2009 (Alberta)
2009
Ethics Review of Multi-Centre Trials: Where Do We Stand? Ethics Review of Multi-Centre Trials: Where Do We Stand?
2009
Ethical Challenges and Evolving Practices in Research on Ethics in Health Research Ethical Challenges and Evolving Practices in Research on Ethics in Health Research
2009
Research Ethics Boards and Challenges for Public Participation Research Ethics Boards and Challenges for Public Participation
2009