Quevedo v. Collins Quevedo v. Collins

Quevedo v. Collins

C05.40397; 414 F.2d 796 (1969)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I. This suit, filed as a class action, was dismissed as being moot because the plaintiff, subsequent to suit, voluntarily moved from the Housing Authority. Eviction without due process was the basis of the suit. See Thorpe v. Housing Authority of City of Durham, 1969, 393 U.S. 268, 89 S. Ct. 518, 21 L. Ed. 2d 474. Two additional tenants, one who had been evicted and one threatened with eviction, sought to intervene. Their petition was also dismissed.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1969
21 août
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
1
Page
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
52,5
Ko

Plus de livres par United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Rapides Regional Medical Center v. Secretary Rapides Regional Medical Center v. Secretary
1992
Price-Trawick Inc. v. Gas Lift Corporation. Price-Trawick Inc. v. Gas Lift Corporation.
1939
Pardo V. United States Pardo V. United States
1966
Nguyen v. District Director Nguyen v. District Director
2005
Rodriguez v. Bexar County Rodriguez v. Bexar County
2004
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. . Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. .
1944