![Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
1975.MI.950 , 235 N.W.2D 732, 395 MICH. 244
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Description de l’éditeur
On the facts of this case, the trial courts rescission of a deed and a written agreement between the parties was justified by the mutual misunderstanding as to the effect of the agreement. In order to avoid an inequitable result with respect to appellant, it is necessary to grant an additur in the amount of $4,500.