Quintana v. Eddins Quintana v. Eddins

Quintana v. Eddins

131 N.M. 435, 38 P.3D 203, 2002-NMCA-008, 2001.NM.0000157, 27 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CAS. 1857

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

1 In this appeal, we consider whether a parent is underemployed for the purpose of imputing income in determining child support when the parent is working full time in his area of expertise, but is earning less than he had made previously when employed in a different state and less than he could make if he had accepted a position with a private company rather than with a state institution. In addition, we determine whether dividend and interest income earned on a self-employed pension, individual retirement account (SEP-IRA) may be treated as income in calculating child support.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
2001
12 décembre
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
23
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
65,9
Ko

Plus de livres par Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

English v. State English v. State
1971
Chamber v. State Chamber v. State
1986
Walters v. State Walters v. State
1986
Gross v. State Gross v. State
1985
Carter v. State Carter v. State
1988
Massengale v. State Massengale v. State
1976