Ramirez v. Brown Ramirez v. Brown

Ramirez v. Brown

CA.40075; 117 Cal. Rptr. 562; 12 Cal. 3d 912; 528 P.2d 378 (1974)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

[12 Cal3d Page 913] In Ramirez v. Brown (1973) 9 Cal. 3d 199, 216-217 [107 Cal. Rptr. 137, 507 P.2d 1345], we held that as applied to all ex-felons whose terms of incarceration and parole have expired, the provisions of article II and article XX, section 11, of the California Constitution denying the right of suffrage to persons convicted of crime, together with the several sections of the Elections Code implementing that disqualification [citation], violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (Fn. omitted.) The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, and held that a provision in section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment imposing the penalty of reduced congressional representation for disfranchisement except for participation in rebellion, or other crime is to be construed to permit the states, without violating section 1 of that amendment, to deny the right to vote to former felons who have completed their sentences and paroles. (Richardson v. Ramirez (1974) 418 U.S. 24 [41 L.Ed.2d 551, 94 S.Ct. 2655].) The Supreme Court further ruled that The California court did not reach respondents' alternative contention that there was such a total lack of uniformity in county election officials' enforcement of the challenged state laws as to work a separate denial of equal protection, and we believe that it should have an opportunity to consider the claim before we address ourselves to it. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. (Id. at p. 56 [41 L.Ed.2d at p. 572].) [12 Cal3d Page 914] Since the date of that mandate, however, the governing provisions of the California Constitution have been changed by vote of the people. At the general election of November 1974 the language of article II, section 3, and article XX, section 11, which formerly disfranchised persons convicted of crime, was deleted; instead, the Legislature is simply directed by new section 3 of article II to provide for the temporary disqualification of electors while they are imprisoned or on parole for the conviction of a felony.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1974
29 novembre
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
2
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
52,9
Ko

Plus de livres par Supreme Court Of California

Borre v. State Bar of California Borre v. State Bar of California
1991
Kipp v. Kipp Kipp v. Kipp
1954
Donovan v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Donovan v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
1952
Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles
1953
Schlothan v. Rusalem Schlothan v. Rusalem
1953
People v. Bechtel People v. Bechtel
1953