![Ramirez v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Ramirez v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Ramirez v. State
810 SO.2D 836, 2001.FL.0005721
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Description de l’éditeur
We have on appeal the judgment and sentence of the trial court imposing the death penalty on Joseph J. Ramirez following his third trial for the first-degree murder of a night courier. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. We reverse the convictions and vacate the sentences for the same reason as before-i.e., the trial court erroneously admitted evidence based on the knife mark identification procedure of Robert Hart.