Team Identification: Measurement Invariance over Preferred and Target Team Focus Points (Report) Team Identification: Measurement Invariance over Preferred and Target Team Focus Points (Report)

Team Identification: Measurement Invariance over Preferred and Target Team Focus Points (Report‪)‬

North American Journal of Psychology 2010, June, 12, 2

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Description de l’éditeur

The organization of the XVIII Olympic Games in Athens, and the first place finish of Greece in the European Soccer Championship have elevated the interest of Greek sport fans in sports, and especially soccer. The allegiance between a fan and a sport team is an important element of sport consumer behavior models (Madrigal, 1995; Trail, Anderson, & Fink, 2005; Trail, Fink, & Anderson, 2000; 2003; Van Leeuwen, Quick, & Daniel, 2002), but research on fans' behaviors and their allegiance with soccer teams in Greece is almost non-existent. One of the multitude of terms used in various academic disciplines to describe this allegiance has been team identification i.e., the extent to which a fan feels psychologically attached to a team (Wann & Branscombe, 1993). Research on team identification can involve many different points of attachment. Although the majority of work has investigated the identification fans feel for a specific team, fans can also develop a strong sense of attachment with many components of the sporting environment (Holt, 1995; Trail, Robinson, Dick, & Gillentine, 2003). For instance, fans may feel a sense of attachment to the institution (e.g., university) represented by a team (Van Leeuwen, Quick, & Daniel, 2002), the sport played by a team (Hill & Green, 2000), and individual players on a team (Basil & Brown, 2004; Mahony, Nakazawa, Funk, James, & Gladden, 2002). Similarly, examining fans' identification with a team can be more involved than it appears on the surface. Specifically, one could assess various aspects of team identification, including one's identification with a specific target team (e.g., "How strongly do you identify with Team X") and one's identification with a favorite or preferred team (e.g., "How strongly do you identify with your favorite team, regardless of who that team is"). Past work utilizing the Sport Spectator Identification Scale (SSIS: Wann & Branscombe, 1993) that has been translated into Greek and initially validated (Theodorakis, Vlachopoulos, Wann, Afthinos, & Nassis, 2006), has examined identification with both "target" teams (e.g., Wann, Bayens, & Driver, 2004; Wann, Dunham, Byrd, & Keenan, 2004; Wann & Pierce, 2005) and identification with preferred/favored teams (e.g., Wann, Dimmock, & Grove, 2003; Wann, Ensor, & Bilyeu, 2001; Wann, Shelton, Smith, & Walker, 2002).

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
2010
1 juin
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
19
Pages
ÉDITIONS
North American Journal of Psychology
TAILLE
215,5
Ko

Plus de livres par North American Journal of Psychology

An Interview with Irvin Yalom (Interview) An Interview with Irvin Yalom (Interview)
2007
Team-Based Learning in an Industrial/Organizational Psychology Course. Team-Based Learning in an Industrial/Organizational Psychology Course.
2007
Differentiating Among Outgroups: Predictors of Congruent and Discordant Prejudice (Report) Differentiating Among Outgroups: Predictors of Congruent and Discordant Prejudice (Report)
2009
Interpersonal and Personality Dimensions of Behavior: FIRO-B and the Big Five. Interpersonal and Personality Dimensions of Behavior: FIRO-B and the Big Five.
2005
Self-Efficacy, Metacognition, And Performance. Self-Efficacy, Metacognition, And Performance.
2008
Social Networking and Political Campaigns: Perceptions of Candidates As Interpersonal Constructs (Report) Social Networking and Political Campaigns: Perceptions of Candidates As Interpersonal Constructs (Report)
2011