Ballard V. State Ballard V. State

Ballard V. State

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

This appeal requires us to decide whether the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, or "HGN" test, satisfies the standard for admissibility of scientific evidence established in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), and reaffirmed as the governing standard in Alaska in Contreras v. State, 718 P.2d 129, 134-36 (Alaska 1986).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1998
3 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
29
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59.8
KB
Paul A. Blume and Judy Ann Blume v. State Paul A. Blume and Judy Ann Blume v. State
1990
Arthur Lee Smith v. State Alaska Arthur Lee Smith v. State Alaska
1984
Floyd Wortham v. State Alaska Floyd Wortham v. State Alaska
1984
Michael Shane Kolkman v. State Alaska Michael Shane Kolkman v. State Alaska
1993
D.E.P. v. State Alaska D.E.P. v. State Alaska
1986
Terry Miller v. State Alaska Terry Miller v. State Alaska
1985