By The Yellow Sky

“ Beyond the yellow lining was a dark lit night and the sky remained.  The sky was a symbol.  The dark was a symbol.  Together; socio and economics fit a bill.  The sky was a symbol.  The darkened lights were tempered and very reactionary.  Counter action and beyond the yellow lining was a dark lit night and the yellow sky remained. ”


What is the concept of socioeconomics?  Does it have to sincerely do with populations, growth and status?  Yes.  The defending line for a true definition of caustic and reality based situations is predictable.  Socioeconomics delves into the heart of what is interpreted, not denied.  SO, why does socio-economic classes divide us?  On one hand the argument is that people should work and work and work and work.  That is a huge / large / incompetent answer, yet the forbearers of relevance show this topic as paramount.  There is more to why we pertain classes and classic systems to old-style words.  The beginning was not a king or tribe or peoples; it was larger.  

It was a start.  It was an end and the end, by proxy.  Rather, all proxy and all variations of the same argument would spread and the ultimate utterance of socioeconomic differences.  The essential classes that divide us were not incompetent, entirely.  It was competent and all real in the eyes of the work / working.   The neutral and retro-neutral combinations could give all socio economic divisions clout, or purpose.  A purpose to come together and less bicker about nothing.  It would be bold.   It would not raise awareness.  It would spread light in a darkened world.   The definition of caustic was predictable, yet stoic.  Stoicism not adhered to in strict definition was a retro-neutral loss.  TO begin:


To lament;


One could begin to degrade the Tigris and Euphrates; but they are still there.  Having been widened and shortened and elongated, they were still there.  One could ascertain that the Romans downfall was the Franks and like associated circulators / developers.  That, thus; the press brought the Gutenberg distribution; and the flip side was beginning to commence jargon and heresy.  That was / is normal.  The ebbing of class and the woes of society are swaying and continue to sway from bank to bank.  The bottom line was that socioeconomic protocols were not as necessary; however today utterance is not possible.  To say, to dream and to dream more.  The evidence in a society that work has been accomplished dis not change by sight but by heart.  Team was more important than a win.  That was heart.  Changing how values are passed down is not discriminatory, but necessary.  It is ok to teach, it is ok to learn and above all it is ok to ask questions?  That is the semi-answer to socio-economic doubts.  The socioeconomic differences are the key., Identifying the problem, identifying the solution and identifying the cause for work / class…  The work that people place strength in is enough.  By no means is this meant to ascertain and correct society, nor economics; but it is relevant.  


So, why do socioeconomic classes divide us?


They do; yet, they do not have to…


It was said that the degradation of the Tigris and Euphrates would go and ebb.  It was said that the degradation of the St. Lawrence and Mississippi would be perpendicular.  Parallel unto the perpendicular; the St. Lawrence was widened by banks upon banks.  The rivers would ebb and flow and the seams of the sediment were jagged, perhaps not complete.  Jagged seams bustling and with out sediment; the river would flow out.  With seams; the bustling river would flow narrower and like a changed heart.  The most reactionary moments were when the reaction over rode the action.  The rivers on both sides of the heart began to see the reach out of one, two and a whole lot more.  Socioeconomics is a word, but a word that describes something…what this something is or will ever become is a mystery.  There was nothing bent; nothing to change.   The malformations of the society made the essence ebb and flow into deeper consciousness.  Deeper consciousness created deeper change.  

Deeper astringency would constrict the counter-action and reactionary reaction, differently.


“ Beyond the yellow lining was a dark lit night and the sky remained.  The sky was a symbol.  The dark was a symbol.  Together; socio and economics fit a bill.  The sky was a symbol.  The darkened lights were tempered and very reactionary.  Counter action and beyond the yellow lining was a dark lit night and the yellow sky remained. ”