Comments on "A Higher and Better Definition" (Letters to the Editor) (Letter to the Editor)
Appraisal Journal 2004, Spring, 72, 2
-
- £2.99
-
- £2.99
Publisher Description
I found the article "A Higher and Better Definition" (Winter 2004) interesting and thought provoking, but I also found myself questioning some of the points made and conclusions reached. I have been working with the current definition of highest and best use for more years than I can remember and have not found the definition to be either ambiguous or redundant. The identity of the conjunction "and" instead of "or" as a problem in the definition appears to me to be a misplaced concern requiring a rather narrow interpretation of the sentence.
GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2004
22 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
The Appraisal Institute
SIZE
244.9
KB
The Accounting Postulates and Principles Controversy of the 1960s
2020
A Journey into Accounting Thought
2001
Inquiry and Decision (Routledge Revivals)
2014
Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
2012
SUPPLEMENT I: Quantum Decision making and Problem Solving
2011
The Nature of Accounting Regulation
2013
Cross-Examination at a Jury Trial. (Features).
2003
Surveying Sustainability: A Short Guide for the Property Professional (International Appraising) (Surveying Sustainability: A Short Guide for the Property) (Excerpt) (Reprint)
2008
A Practical Tool to Assist in Analyzing Risk Associated with Income Capitalization Approach Valuation Or Investment Analysis (Features; Excel Model)
2003
Discount Rates for Consistent Valuation of Various Measures of Book Income and Cash Flow (Features)
2003
Primary and Secondary Data: Concepts, Concerns, Errors, And Issues. (Features) (In Appraisals Or Real Estate Market Analysis)
2003
The Use of Focus Groups for Property Valuation Research.
2011