Edwards v. Lostrom
197 P.3D 1128, 224 OR.APP. 253, 2008.OR.0000830
-
- £0.49
-
- £0.49
Publisher Description
Respondent appeals a stalking protective order prohibiting him from contacting his granddaughter. He challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced at the hearing in support of the issuance of the order. On de novo review, Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or App 525, 537, 953 P2d 1130 (1998), rev den, 328 Or 418 (1999), we conclude that the evidence was legally insufficient and reverse.