Edwin George Angell v. Dana W. Hadley Et Al.
WA.40168; 207 P.2d 191; 33 Wash. 2d 837 (1949)
-
- £0.49
-
- £0.49
Publisher Description
[33 Wash2d Page 837] This action, though brought for the stated purpose of rescinding a contract of sale, and based upon alleged misrepresentations as to the extent of the property purchased on a partial payment plan, really involved a dispute as to the dividing line between certain properties.