F. Arnold Daum v. Robert C. Meade Et Al‪.‬

In our opinion plaintiff, an abutting landowner within eyesight of the proposed industrial park, established at least prima facie that he was ""aggrieved"" and was entitled to maintain the instant action to enjoin illegal zoning practices and to obtain a determination of the issue of the legality of the zoning ordinance. As we view the record, the trial court never reached this question or passed on it (cf. Matter of Manor Woods Assn. v. Randol, 29 A.D.2d 778). Disposition Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and case remitted to the trial court for a determination of the merits of the controversy, with costs to abide the event.