Fidel v. Farley Fidel v. Farley

Fidel v. Farley

392 F.3D 220, 2004 FED.APP. 0433P, 2004.C06.0000615

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

Plaintiffs-appellants, a class consisting of investors who purchased Fruit of the Loom stock between September 29, 1998, and November 4, 1999 ("Class Period"), filed suit against defendants William Farley, Fruit of the Looms Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Operating Officer; G. William Newton, Fruit of the Looms Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer; and defendant-appellee Ernst & Young, Fruit of the Looms auditor, under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j, and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The plaintiffs alleged in their original complaint that Farley and Newton had knowingly or recklessly misrepresented Fruit of the Looms condition during the Class Period in a successful effort to artificially inflate the price of the companys stock. They also alleged that Ernst & Young participated in the fraud by knowingly or recklessly issuing an unqualified audit opinion approving Fruit of the Looms 1998 financial statements and by consenting to that audit opinions inclusion in investor solicitation materials for a $250 million securities offering.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
16 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
33
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
66.7
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

United States v. Bruce United States v. Bruce
2005
Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
1969
Western Shoshone Business Council v. Babbitt Western Shoshone Business Council v. Babbitt
1993
In Re Oyler In Re Oyler
2005
Occusafe Inc. v. Eg&G Rocky Flats Inc. Occusafe Inc. v. Eg&G Rocky Flats Inc.
1995
Grider v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp. Grider v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.
1989