Fidelity And Deposit Company Maryland v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
1983.NY.45350 455 N.E.2D 1259; 60 N.Y.2D 693
-
- £0.49
-
- £0.49
Publisher Description
Whether Special Terms vacatur of defendants default in answering was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law is a question of law reviewable by certified question (Barasch v Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594, 598). The appeal is, t
GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1983
29 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
68
KB
More Books by Court of Appeals of New York
Islamic Republic Iran v. Mohammed Reza Pahlavi
1984
Crescent Electrical Installation Corp. v. Board Education City New York (I.S. 151/P.S. 156)
1980
Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis
1958
Matter Anthony Rush v. Norman Mordue
1986
Standard Wine & Liquor Co. v. Bombay Spirits Co.
1967
Matter Estate Mark Rothko
1977