Hart v. State
173 S.W.3D 131, 2005.TX.0006392
-
- £0.49
-
- £0.49
Publisher Description
Stow Kingdon Hart appeals from his conviction by a jury for aggravated sexual assault. The jury assessed his punishment at ninety-nine years imprisonment. Before trial, the court held a hearing before a separate jury to determine whether Hart was competent to stand trial. The jury found him competent. Counsel raises a number of issues on appeal directed at both the competency hearing and the trial on the merits.