Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company V. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company V.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company V‪.‬

1938.MN.94, 278 N.W. 591, 202 MINN. 410

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

1. The test of the sufficiency of a complaint on general demurrer is not whether it states the precise cause of action intended, or whether the pleader appreciated the nature of his remedy, or asked for appropriate relief, but whether the facts stated, expressly or inferentially, giving to the language the benefit of all reasonable intendments, show the plaintiff to be entitled to some judicial relief.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1938
1 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
65.1
KB

More Books by En Banc Supreme Court of Minnesota

James D. Armstrong v. Potlatch Corporation James D. Armstrong v. Potlatch Corporation
1988
State Ex Rel. Louis Haak v. Board State Ex Rel. Louis Haak v. Board
1985
Marvis Stensland v. County Faribault Marvis Stensland v. County Faribault
1985
Janet Swenson v. Emerson Electric Company Janet Swenson v. Emerson Electric Company
1985
Norman Cairl v. City St. Paul Norman Cairl v. City St. Paul
1978
State Minnesota v. Herbert Daniel Notch State Minnesota v. Herbert Daniel Notch
1989