Haseltine v. Central Bank Springfield Haseltine v. Central Bank Springfield

Haseltine v. Central Bank Springfield

22 S. CT. 49, 183 U.S. 130, 46 L. ED. 117, 1901.SCT.40278

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

The motion to dismiss must be granted. We have frequently held that a judgment reversing that of the court below, and remanding the case for further proceedings, is not one to which a writ of error will lie. The case of Mower v. Fletcher, 114 U.S. 127, is not in point, as the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State remanded that case to the inferior court with an order to enter a specified judgment, nothing being left to the judicial discretion of the court below. A like ruling was made in Atherton v. Fowler, 91 U.S. 143, and Commissioners of Tippecanoe County v. Lucas, 93 U.S. 108.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1901
2 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
61.9
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of the United States

Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Loving Et Ux. v. Virginia Loving Et Ux. v. Virginia
1967
Hallman v. Florida Sullivan v. Florida Sawyer v. Florida and Spenkelink v. Florida Hallman v. Florida Sullivan v. Florida Sawyer v. Florida and Spenkelink v. Florida
1976
Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas
1981
Gregg v. Georgia. Jurek v. Texas. Woodson Et Al. v. North Carolina. Proffitt v. Florida. Roberts v. Louisiana Gregg v. Georgia. Jurek v. Texas. Woodson Et Al. v. North Carolina. Proffitt v. Florida. Roberts v. Louisiana
1976