Headley v. Morgan Management Corp. Headley v. Morgan Management Corp.

Headley v. Morgan Management Corp‪.‬

110 P.3D 1076, 137 N.M. 339, 2005-NMCA-045, 2005.NM.0000028

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

1 In this appeal, we consider whether Defendant Morgan Management Corporation (MMC) can be sued for negligence, or whether it is protected by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers Compensation Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-6(E) (1990), -8 (1989), and -9 (1973). The answer depends on the relationship between MMC and Plaintiffs. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of MMC on Plaintiffs negligence claim, determining that MMC and Morgan Building and Spa Manufacturing Corporation (MFG) have the "same identity" for purposes of the Act and, therefore, the Act provided Plaintiffs sole remedy against MMC. We agree and conclude that Plaintiffs tort claim is barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Act.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2005
3 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
68.5
KB

More Books by Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

D.M.T. v. Edmiston D.M.T. v. Edmiston
1977
Farmington Police officers Association Communication Workers of America Local 7911 v. City of Farmington Farmington Police officers Association Communication Workers of America Local 7911 v. City of Farmington
2006
Chamber v. State Chamber v. State
1986
Walters v. State Walters v. State
1986
Gross v. State Gross v. State
1985
Carter v. State Carter v. State
1988