Hearns v. San Bernardino Police Dept Hearns v. San Bernardino Police Dept

Hearns v. San Bernardino Police Dept

530 F.3D 1124, 2008 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 10,127, 103 FAIR EMPL.PRAC.CAS. (BNA) 1142, 08 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 8354, 2008.C09.0002708

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

It is the right and duty of a plaintiff initiating a case to file a "short and plain statement of the claim." Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 8(a)(2). The district court dismissed Plaintiff Kimberlyn Hearns 81-page complaint under Rule 8 without prejudice with leave to file an amended complaint. When Hearns filed an amended complaint that was substantially unaltered, the district court dismissed the case with prejudice. Neither complaint warranted dismissal under Rule 8: although each set forth excessively detailed factual allegations, they were coherent, well-organized, and stated legally viable claims. We therefore reverse in appeal No. 05-56214 and remand for further proceedings. Pursuant to Defendants non-opposition, we also reverse in appeal No. 05-56306. Finally, we dismiss appeals Nos. 05-56272 and 05-56324 as moot.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2008
1 July
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
33
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
90
KB

More Books by Alaska Supreme Court

Era Aviation Inc. V. Seekins Era Aviation Inc. V. Seekins
1999
Keane V. Local Boundary Commission Keane V. Local Boundary Commission
1995
Coughlin v. Government Employees Insurance Co. Coughlin v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
2003
Powers v. United Services Automobile Association Powers v. United Services Automobile Association
2000
Tush v. Pharr Tush v. Pharr
2003
Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System v. Gallion Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System v. Gallion
2003