Heatherly v. Montgomery Components Inc. Heatherly v. Montgomery Components Inc.

Heatherly v. Montgomery Components Inc‪.‬

1984.NC.40188; 71 N.C. APP. 377; 323 S.E.2D 29

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

Defendants assignments of error are that the Full Commission erred in finding as fact and making conclusions of law thereon (1) that plaintiffs fracture on 4 July 1981 was the direct and natural result of the compensable injury of 24 October 1980; (2) that the added pressure on plaintiffs right leg during the fall sustained on 4 July 1981 was sufficient to cause the second injury; (3) that if the first fracture had been healed, the added pressure alone most probably would not have caused the refracture; (4) that plaintiff was temporarily totally disabled as a result of the original injury from 24 October 1980 until 4 July 1981; and (5) ordering defendants to pay all plaintiffs medical bills. We affirm the Full Commissions order awarding plaintiff compensation for the refracture but reverse and remand that part of the order directing defendants to pay compensation from 11 June 1981 to 4 July 1981.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1984
20 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
64.4
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of New York

Islamic Republic Iran v. Mohammed Reza Pahlavi Islamic Republic Iran v. Mohammed Reza Pahlavi
1984
Crescent Electrical Installation Corp. v. Board Education City New York (I.S. 151/P.S. 156) Crescent Electrical Installation Corp. v. Board Education City New York (I.S. 151/P.S. 156)
1980
Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis
1958
Matter Anthony Rush v. Norman Mordue Matter Anthony Rush v. Norman Mordue
1986
Standard Wine & Liquor Co. v. Bombay Spirits Co. Standard Wine & Liquor Co. v. Bombay Spirits Co.
1967
Matter Estate Mark Rothko Matter Estate Mark Rothko
1977