Hebb v. Maryland Hebb v. Maryland

Hebb v. Maryland

MD.40262; 31 Md. App. 493; 356 A.2d 583 (1976)

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

The Law Whenever the voluntariness of an accused's confession, or other self-incriminating statement1 made to police officers or prosecutorial officials, is attacked at trial, the judge should follow the guidelines laid down by the Court of Appeals in Day v. State, 196 Md. 384, 399, 76 A.2d 729, 736 (1950), as explicated and embellished, by this Court, in Mulligan v. State, 18 Md. App. 588, 308 A.2d 418 (1973); Mulligan v. State, 10 Md. App. 429, 271 A.2d 385 (1970); Barnhart v. State, 5 Md. App. 222, 246 A.2d 280 (1968).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1976
10 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
56.6
KB