Hecker v. Fowler Hecker v. Fowler

Hecker v. Fowler

66 U.S. 95, 1861.SCT.0000071

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

Mr. Andrews, of New York, in support of the motion. The iacts are not found in a general or special verdict, nor agreed on in a case stated, and there is no bill of exceptions. This court must, therefore, affirm the judgment, unless there is error apparent on the face of the record. Graham vs. Bayne, (18 How., 60;) Guild vs. Frontin, (18 How., 135;) Suydam vs. Williamson, (20 How., 427;) Kelsey vs. Forsyth, (21 How., 85;) Campbell vs. Boyreace, (21 How., 223.) There is no error on the fact of this record. Mr. Monroe, of New York, resisted the motion.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1861
1 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
48.9
KB

More Books by United States Supreme Court

Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford
1856
Bush v. Gore Bush v. Gore
2000
United States v. Jones United States v. Jones
1886
Nat. Steam-Ship Co. v. Tugman Nat. Steam-Ship Co. v. Tugman
1882
Harrison v. Sterry and Others Harrison v. Sterry and Others
1809
The United States, Appellants v. Ellen E. White The United States, Appellants v. Ellen E. White
1859