Illingworth V. Bushong Illingworth V. Bushong

Illingworth V. Bushong

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

The narrow issue is whether the trial court erred in deciding that a forfeiture clause in an earnest money agreement was not a valid liquidated damages provision. We hold that there was no error in that respect. The broader question addressed in this opinion is how the validity of such clauses is to be tested.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1984
5 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
31
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
66.8
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Oregon

Refrigerated Transport Inc. v. Creek Refrigerated Transport Inc. v. Creek
1979
Bires v. Barney Bires v. Barney
1953
Sleep v. Morrill Sleep v. Morrill
1953
Kingsley v. Jacobs Kingsley v. Jacobs
1952
School District No. 1 v. Bingham School District No. 1 v. Bingham
1955
Maxwell v. Portland Terminal Railroad Co. Maxwell v. Portland Terminal Railroad Co.
1969