![Illinois Corporate Travel Inc. v. American Airlines Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Illinois Corporate Travel Inc. v. American Airlines Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Illinois Corporate Travel Inc. v. American Airlines Inc.
C07.40128; 889 F.2d 751 (1989)
-
- £0.49
-
- £0.49
Publisher Description
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. American Airlines would like to ban discounting by the firms that sell its tickets, but a prohibition cannot be enforced. Under-the-table discounts, rebates by ""captives"" (travel subsidiaries of the firms whose employees are traveling), and tie-in sales (packages of air travel and other services such as hotels, with the price reduction on the air fare allocated for bookkeeping purposes to the hotel or car rental) are endemic. American decided to demand only what it was prepared to enforce: it issued an Addendum to the agreement all travel service operators must sign forbidding those selling its tickets to advertise that they offer discounts. A division of Illinois Corporate Travel, Inc., operating under the name McTravel Travel Services, advertised discounts on American; American denied it access to the plate used to issue its tickets and informed other air carriers that it would not accept tickets McTravel wrote using other carriers' plates.