In Re Dimas In Re Dimas

In Re Dimas

88 S.W.3d 349, 2002.TX.0004839

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

On April 30, 2002, relator, Daniel Dimas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging respondent, Judge Sharon MacRae, abused her discretion in failing to rule on his motion for forensic DNA testing. This court denied relators petition without prejudice to refile a petition for writ of mandamus accompanied by a record demonstrating that relator called his motion to the trial courts attention and asked for a ruling. See In re Dimas, No. 04-02-00317-CV, 2002 WL 1058534 (San Antonio May 29, 2002)(orig. proceeding)(not designated for publication). Relator has refiled his petition for writ of mandamus with a record that satisfies Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8. Because respondent has initiated some action on relators motion, we deny relators petition.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
31 July
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
45.3
KB

More Books by Texas Court of Appeals

In Re Koch Industries In Re Koch Industries
2001
Deaver v. Bridges Deaver v. Bridges
2000
International Freight Forwarding Inc. v. American Flange International Freight Forwarding Inc. v. American Flange
1999
Compass Bank v. Bent Creek Investments Compass Bank v. Bent Creek Investments
2001
Chichester School District v. Chichester Education Association Chichester School District v. Chichester Education Association
2000
Natural Gas Clearninghouse V. Midgard Energy Company Natural Gas Clearninghouse V. Midgard Energy Company
2003