In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Sanders
135 WASH.2D 175, 955 P.2D 369, 1998.WA.628
-
- £0.49
-
- £0.49
Publisher Description
A Justice of the State Supreme Court, as any Judge, is required to maintain the appearance of impartiality. Doing so is oftentimes difficult, and requires significant restraint by the judicial officer when it comes to public appearances and remarks, particularly with respect to subjects and subject matter that are the focus of widespread public debate and controversy. In this case, the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct determined that Justice Richard B. Sanders did not exercise sufficient restraint. We hold, however, that what Justice Sanders did and said at a March for Life rally on the day of his official swearing-in does not rise to a level permitting sanction, at least not on this record and not consistent with Justice Sanders legitimate expectations under the state and federal constitutions.