IRB Policies Regarding Finder's Fees and Role Conflicts in Recruiting Research Participants (Insight) (Report) IRB Policies Regarding Finder's Fees and Role Conflicts in Recruiting Research Participants (Insight) (Report)

IRB Policies Regarding Finder's Fees and Role Conflicts in Recruiting Research Participants (Insight) (Report‪)‬

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2009, Jan-Feb, 31, 1

    • £2.99
    • £2.99

Publisher Description

Conflicts of interest may arise during the recruitment of research subjects in several ways. Financial conflicts of interest may arise when research sponsors (or their agents) pay members of the research team or clinicians to identify potential participants (often referred to as "finder's fees") or when the research team or clinicians meet predetermined enrollment targets. (1) These types of payment practices raise concerns because researchers and their colleagues, enticed by these financial offers, may be tempted to enroll individuals in studies for which they are ineligible to participate. Nonfinancial conflicts may arise when the investigator has a relationship with the prospective participant that involves an imbalance of power, such as when the investigator is the individual's physician, supervisor, or teacher (referred to as "role conflict"). (2) When this type of relationship exists, patients, employees, or students may agree to participate in the investigator's research in the hope that in return for enrolling in the study they will receive better medical care, employment perks, or good grades. On the other hand, they might enroll in the research out of fear that not doing so could negatively impact their medical care, employment, or grades. Another concern is that if patients interpret their physician's offer to participate in a study as affirmation that the study intervention is clinical treatment (i.e, the "therapeutic misconception"), they might be reluctant to decline to participate. (3)

GENRE
Health & Well-Being
RELEASED
2009
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
Hastings Center
SIZE
216.6
KB

More Books by IRB: Ethics & Human Research

Bipolar Mania and Capacity to Consent: Recommendations for Investigators and Irbs (Insight) (Report) Bipolar Mania and Capacity to Consent: Recommendations for Investigators and Irbs (Insight) (Report)
2010
Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences. Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences.
2009
Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (In the Field) Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (In the Field)
2009
Research Benefits for Hypothetical HIV Vaccine Trials: The Views of Ugandans in the Rakai District. Research Benefits for Hypothetical HIV Vaccine Trials: The Views of Ugandans in the Rakai District.
2008
Consent for Future Genetic Research: The NHANES Experience in 2007-2008 (In the Field) (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey ) Consent for Future Genetic Research: The NHANES Experience in 2007-2008 (In the Field) (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey )
2011
Comprehension and Informed Consent: Assessing the Effect of a Short Consent Form (Report) Comprehension and Informed Consent: Assessing the Effect of a Short Consent Form (Report)
2010