Minimal Risk and Large-Scale Biobank and Cohort Research Minimal Risk and Large-Scale Biobank and Cohort Research

Minimal Risk and Large-Scale Biobank and Cohort Research

Health Law Review 2009, Spring-Summer, 17, 2-3

    • £2.99
    • £2.99

Publisher Description

Introduction Minimal risk is a core concept in research ethics, but its proper role in the regulation of large-scale biobank and cohort research is unsettled. By framing a project as posing only minimal risk to research participants, researchers may be afforded a degree of latitude in the design and implementation of consent procedures. In the context of large-scale population biobank and cohort studies, whether and to what degree of specificity one is required to seek informed consent from study participants is a critical issue. (1)

GENRE
Health & Well-Being
RELEASED
2009
22 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
16
Pages
PUBLISHER
Health Law Institute
SIZE
77.3
KB

More Books by Health Law Review

The Mental Health Act and the Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship Act: Working Together to Protect the Rights of Albertans The Mental Health Act and the Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship Act: Working Together to Protect the Rights of Albertans
2010
Everything You Want to Know About Changes to the Mental Health Act in Alberta Everything You Want to Know About Changes to the Mental Health Act in Alberta
2010
Decision-Making Processes Regarding Cancer Technologies: A Review (Canada) Decision-Making Processes Regarding Cancer Technologies: A Review (Canada)
2008
Exploiting the Fiduciary Relationship: The Physician As Information Intermediary in Assisted Human Reproduction (Canada) Exploiting the Fiduciary Relationship: The Physician As Information Intermediary in Assisted Human Reproduction (Canada)
2009
Submission to Standing Committee on Health Bill 52, Health Information Amendment Act, 2009 April 24, 2009 (Alberta) Submission to Standing Committee on Health Bill 52, Health Information Amendment Act, 2009 April 24, 2009 (Alberta)
2009
Ethics Review of Multi-Centre Trials: Where Do We Stand? Ethics Review of Multi-Centre Trials: Where Do We Stand?
2009