Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance Plan
619 F.3D 1151, 49 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CAS. 2345, 77 FED.R.SERV.3D 590, 2010.C10.0001047
-
- £0.49
-
- £0.49
Publisher Description
Plaintiff-Appellant Aileen Murphy was a participant in the Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance Plan ("the Plan"), an insurance plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife") both insured and administered the Plan; thus, it operated under an inherent dual role conflict of interest, see Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co., 541 F.3d 1002, 1011 (10th Cir. 2008). While a participant in the Plan, Ms. Murphy filed a claim for long-term disability benefits, which MetLife ultimately denied.