Pate v. Robinson Pate v. Robinson

Pate v. Robinson

86 S. CT. 836, 383 U.S. 375, 15 L. ED. 2D 815, 1966.SCT.40667

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

In 1959 respondent Robinson was convicted of the murder of his common-law wife, Flossie May Ward, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life. Being an indigent he was defended by court-appointed counsel. It was conceded at trial that Robinson shot and killed Flossie May, but his counsel claimed that he was insane at the time of the shooting and raised the issue of his incompetence to stand trial. On writ of error to the Supreme Court of Illinois it was asserted that the trial courts rejection of these contentions deprived Robinson of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. His conviction was affirmed, the court finding that no hearing on mental capacity to stand trial had been requested, that the evidence failed to raise sufficient doubt as to his competence to require the trial court to

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1966
7 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
22
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
63.1
KB
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Loving Et Ux. v. Virginia Loving Et Ux. v. Virginia
1967
Hallman v. Florida Sullivan v. Florida Sawyer v. Florida and Spenkelink v. Florida Hallman v. Florida Sullivan v. Florida Sawyer v. Florida and Spenkelink v. Florida
1976
Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas
1981
Gregg v. Georgia. Jurek v. Texas. Woodson Et Al. v. North Carolina. Proffitt v. Florida. Roberts v. Louisiana Gregg v. Georgia. Jurek v. Texas. Woodson Et Al. v. North Carolina. Proffitt v. Florida. Roberts v. Louisiana
1976