The Hundred-Years war: The Ongoing Battle Between Courts and Agencies over the Right to Interpret Federal Law.
Missouri Law Review 2009, Fall, 74, 4
-
- £2.99
-
- £2.99
Publisher Description
I. INTRODUCTION For much of the last century, there has been an ongoing battle between federal courts and agencies over the right to interpret federal statutes. (2) At times, courts have deferred to agencies' interpretations. At other times, courts have demanded that agencies follow court interpretations. In some instances, this has resulted in the development of two distinct bodies of law interpreting federal statues: one created by federal courts and another by federal agencies.
More Books Like This
The Perils of Bright Lines: Section 6110(K) (3) and the Ambiguous Precedential Status of Written Determinations.
2005
Of Lenity, Chevron, and KPMG
2007
Securities Law in the Roberts Court: Agenda Or Indifference?
2011
Tethering the Administrative State: The Case Against Chevron Deference for FCC Jurisdictional Claims.
2011
More Books by Missouri Law Review
Risks and Realities of Mezzanine Loans (Symposium: A Festschrift in Honor of Dale A. Whitman)
2007
Less is More: Decluttering the State Action Doctrine.
2008
Tesla, Marconi, And the Great Radio Controversy: Awarding Patent Damages Without Chilling a Defendant's Incentive to Innovate (Great Inventor Nikola Tesla)
2008
Federalism and International Law Through the Lens of Legal Pluralism.
2008
There But for the Grace of God Go I: the Right of Cross-Examination in Social Security Disability Hearings.
2009
Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009