Community Credit Union, Inc. v. Connors

The plaintiff sued the defendants, Connors and Behrle, on their joint and several note. The issues were framed by a second substitute complaint and an answer incorporating a general denial and a special defense alleging usury, fraud, and ultra vires conduct on the plaintiff's part. The court found for the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed from the judgment. The defendants have attacked the finding, but it is not subject to any correction which will advantage them. It recites the following facts: The plaintiff is a credit union organized under the laws of this state. Credit unions are mutual savings and [141 Conn. 303]