Labarbera v. Batsch Labarbera v. Batsch

Labarbera v. Batsch

10 Ohio St.2d 106, 227 N.E.2d 55, OH.40057(1967)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

O'NEILL, J. Broadly stated, the issue in this case concerns the relationship between the saving statute, Section 2305.19, Revised Code, and the principle of res judicata. more precisely, the question is whether a case wherein final judgment has been rendered for the defendant on the ground that the action was not commenced within the period prescribed by statute, which judgment was appealed from and affirmed and further appeal rights have long since expired, can be rebrought under Section 2305.19, Revised Code.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1967
19 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
2
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
57.5
KB

More Books by The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio

Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati
1987
Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli
1987
Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth. Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth.
1953
In re Pottery In re Pottery
1954
State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
2004
State v. Doe State v. Doe
2004